SALLY OF THE SAWDUST is famed director D. W. Griffith's
adaptation of Poppy,
the Broadway show that starred W. C. Fields as a circus and
carnival barker. Unfortunately, Griffith's version of the
show concentrates more on the character of Sally (Poppy in the
show and later sound film) rather than on Fields' Professor
Eustace McGargle. This decision would have been more palatable had
Griffith cast an actress who could play the role properly, but
unfortunately he insisted on using his long-time girlfriend
Carol
Dempster, whose characterization of an innocent, tomboyish
waif
too often comes off as mentally handicapped. I may sound too
harsh
about an actress and a performance filmed eight decades ago,
but I
find her utterly charmless.
Meanwhile, Fields is relegated to doing some minor comedy bits here and there, the kind of stuff that would be throwaway gags in his later sound films. Even when we are treated to some vintage Fields juggling, Griffith either cuts away too soon, films it at an awkward angle or both. You would think that a man who was known as the world's finest comic juggler would deserve a little more time to show off that skill, but Griffith, who reportedly got along well with the comedian and vice verse, seems to have little interest in highlighting the star comic. Instead, we get endless scenes featuring Sally and her bad eccentric dancing, while Fields has to contend to shoehorn his comedy in short cutaways, some of the comedy bits so short they hardly feature comedy at all. Griffith's editing is often clumsy too, with cuts from medium shots to closeups often repeating the same bit of action, or else showing characters in positions they weren't in the previous shot. I have the utmost respect for Griffith's contributions to the art of the motion picture, but later journeymen directors like Eddie Sutherland, Eddie Cline and Norman Z. McLeod knew instinctively that when you have W. C. Fields as your star, you merely need to point the camera in his direction and sit back in your canvas chair while he does his stuff.
Fields still does fine work in
what is more of a
character part than a lead comedy role. Having spent much of
his
early stage career as a silent juggler on stage, Fields is perfectly
suited for the silent screen, and his voice is missed only because we
are fully aware of how much Fields's unique voice would bring to his
screen character. In 1936, Fields would star in POPPY, the
sound
version of the same show. Despite Fields's slightly subdued
performance - he was ill and suffered back problems during the filming
- the 1936 film is much preferable.
- JB